Some of you may now that I'm currently ghostwriting a book for a man who wnats to put his thoughts about a certain area of knowledge out there. As he is a journalist, and has worked for more than a decade in that beat, it's only natural that he does so. There might be quite a lot of people interested in what he has to say, besides his reporting, lectures and media appearances. So far, so good.
What's the problem then? The problem is that as soon as I actually sat down with him to talk about all the things he has to say... I discovered he doesn't really have much to say. What appears as expertise on screen seems to be largely a mass of unoriginal opinions, sometimes with little basis in fact. Now I'm tasked with writing a 120ish-page book from what should amount to maybe 40.
This is my first "pure" ghostwriting job, and I won't turn it down (even if it wasn't already too late for that). So, I've taken up the task of researching the field he appears to know so much about, to give his opinions a solid foundation. It's not a pleasurable task because I tend to think differently about these matters, but that comes with the territory.
I suspect that many ghostwriters face the same problems, and I'd like to know what they do when they realize they don't actually have enough material for a book, but they must write one. But I know very few ghostwriters and none of those are my friends.
Live and learn, I guess.
I might already have the next job lined up, and this time it seems like it will be more pleasant, since the book would be more like a memoir, and the subject is obviously an authority in herself.